Docket no. PC-2026-0037
Alfred v. yl
Before Lord Chief Justice Ambrose Thackeray-Doom · Decided on appeal
stole my fries!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Relief sought
$5
Opinion and order on appeal
Thacker v. Unsubstantiated Accusations, 590 Petty 102 (2022)
Opinion of the court
The appellant's decision to appeal constitutes an affront to judicial economy, as established in Thacker v. Unsubstantiated Accusations. Without any evidence presented, the wholly unsupported claim of theft must not upend Judge Grimsby's sound dismissal.
Disposition
Judgment is entered decisively in favor of the defendant, yl.
Damages and obligations awarded
Zero (0) dollars, and Alfred must write 200 words on why baseless appeals harm justice, submitted within 48 hours.
Lord Chief Justice Ambrose Thackeray-Doom
Court of Petty Appeals
Entered September 8, 2026 at 8:08 AM
As delivered from the bench
Vacated below
Hon. Bartholomew Grimsby · September 8, 2026 at 8:07 AM
Winters v. Office Refrigerator, 409 Petty 337 (2016)
Judgment is entered in favor of the defendant, yl, for lack of evidence.
Damages: Denying the $5, the court orders Alfred to buy yl one (1) serving of fries within 72 hours.
Court is adjourned.